Integration of Neuroscience into Early Childhood Educational Psychology: A Critical Literature Review of Cognition, Emotion, and Pedagogical Implications

Authors

  • Hani Hasnah Safitri Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia Author
  • Ulul Albab Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia Author
  • Siti Mumun Muniroh Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia Author
  • Mohammad Adam Universiti Islam Antarbangsa Sultan Islmail Petra University, Malaysia Author
  • Faiz Akhmad Khan Rajshree Institute of Management and Technology Bareilly Uttar Pradesh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64850/jecep.v2i1.171

Keywords:

Educational Neuroscience, Early Childhood Educational Psychology, Cognition and Emotion in Early Learning, Reflective Pedagogy

Abstract

The integration of neuroscience into early childhood educational psychology has gained increasing scholarly attention in response to the need for a holistic and evidence-based understanding of young children’s learning and development. This article aims to critically analyze the contribution of neuroscience in enriching the theoretical framework of early childhood educational psychology, particularly in understanding the interrelationship between cognition, emotion, and pedagogical implications in early learning contexts. Employing a critical literature review approach, this study examines articles from reputable international and accredited national journals related to educational neuroscience, early childhood education, and educational psychology. The analysis is conducted through a reflective thematic synthesis that places neuroscientific findings in dialogical engagement with contemporary educational theory. The findings indicate that neuroscience functions as an epistemic lens that deepens understanding of early childhood learning processes, rather than as a direct methodological prescription for classroom practice. This article emphasizes the importance of critical awareness of neuromyths and highlights neuroscience as a foundation for early childhood educators’ professional reflection in designing developmentally appropriate, ethical, and meaningful learning experiences. Theoretically, this study contributes to an integrative framework for early childhood educational psychology, while practically offering reflective direction for educators and researchers in engaging with neuroscience critically and responsibly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansari, D., Coch, D., & De Smedt, B. (2011). Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00705.x

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(Volume 63, 2012), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Biesta, G. J. J. (2015). Good Education in an Age of Measurement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications. https://www.torrossa.com/it/resources/an/5282292

Breuer, F., & Schreier, M. (2010). Lehren und Lernen qualitativer Forschungsmethoden. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 408–420). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_29

Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the Brain: A Bridge Too Far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026008004

Cowan, N. (2014). Working Memory Underpins Cognitive Development, Learning, and Education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9246-y

CTTL, T. (2020, September 10). The Teenage Brain. The Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning. https://www.thecttl.org/2020/09/10/the-teenage-brain-tdd/

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Handbook of Self-determination Research. University Rochester Press.

Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in Education: Prevalence and Predictors of Misconceptions among Teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429

Designua. (n.d.). Internal structures of the human brain: Basal ganglia, thalamus, hypothalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus [Vector illustration]. Shutterstock. https://www.shutterstock.com/

Elleseff, T. (2023). Attention: All that matters. Smart Speech Therapy.

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Hart, C. (2018). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5019541

Howard-Jones, P. (2018). Evolution of the Learning Brain: Or How You Got To Be So Smart . . . (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150857

Howard-Jones, P. A., Varma, S., Ansari, D., Butterworth, B., De Smedt, B., Goswami, U., Laurillard, D., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2016). The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: Comment on Bowers (2016). Psychological Review, 123(5), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000036

Howells, K. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030: the future we want [Working paper]. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.

Immordino‐Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We Feel, Therefore We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to Education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Immordino-Yang, M. H., Darling-Hammond, L., & Krone, C. (2019). Nurturing Nature: How Brain Development Is Inherently Social and Emotional, and What This Means for Education. EdWorkingPaper No. 19-106. Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED670908

Jailani, M., Suyadi, & Djubaedi, D. (2021). Menelusuri Jejak Otak dan ‘Aql Dalam Alquran Perspektif Neurosains dan Pendidikan Islam di Era Pandemi Covid-19. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v16i1.4347

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (Vol. 2). Keele University.

Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011). Brain Plasticity and Behaviour in the Developing Brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20(4), 265–276.

Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e‐learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1989). The Attention System of the Human Brain (No. TR891). Article TR891. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA206157/

Sarangi, A., Department of Zoology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar-751003, India., Paital, B., & Redox Regulation Laboratory, Department of Zoology, College of Basic Science and Humanities, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar-751003, India. (2021). Unilateral colonization of fungal infection presenting as renal mass in young patient: A case report. Journal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.52768/2766-7820/1451

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Squire, L. R., & Dede, A. J. O. (2015). Conscious and Unconscious Memory Systems. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(3), a021667. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021667

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

The Center for Transformative Teaching and Learning. (2023). The MBE guidebook: Research-informed strategies for the classroom. CTTL. https://the-cttl.org/

Thomas, C., & Baker, C. I. (2013). Teaching an adult brain new tricks: A critical review of evidence for training-dependent structural plasticity in humans. NeuroImage, 73, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.069

Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2014). Making Classrooms Better: 50 Practical Applications of Mind, Brain, and Education Science. W. W. Norton & Company.

Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2018). Neuromyths: Debunking False Ideas About The Brain. W. W. Norton & Company.

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Zakrajsek, T. D. (2023). The New Science of Learning: How to Learn in Harmony With Your Brain (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003447986

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Integration of Neuroscience into Early Childhood Educational Psychology: A Critical Literature Review of Cognition, Emotion, and Pedagogical Implications. (2026). Journal of Early Childhood Education Perspectives, 2(1), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.64850/jecep.v2i1.171